Pragmatic Testen Sie Ihren Wortschatz mit unseren lustigen Bild-Quiz.
pragmatic Bedeutung, Definition pragmatic: 1. solving problems in a sensible way that suits the conditions that really exist now, rather than. Pragmatic Definition: A pragmatic way of dealing with something is based on practical considerations, rather | Bedeutung, Aussprache, Übersetzungen und. Übersetzung für 'pragmatic' im kostenlosen Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch von LANGENSCHEIDT – mit Beispielen, Synonymen und Aussprache. pragmatic - of an approach: practical Adj. praxisorientiert. Weitere Aktionen. Neue Diskussion starten Gespeicherte Vokabeln sortieren. stefandrukker.nl | Übersetzungen für 'pragmatic' im Englisch-Deutsch-Wörterbuch, mit echten Sprachaufnahmen, Illustrationen, Beugungsformen.
Many translated example sentences containing "pragmatic" – German-English dictionary and search engine for German translations. pragmatic - of an approach: practical Adj. praxisorientiert. Weitere Aktionen. Neue Diskussion starten Gespeicherte Vokabeln sortieren. Übersetzung im Kontext von „pragmatic“ in Englisch-Deutsch von Reverso Context: pragmatic approach, pragmatic way, pragmatic solutions.
Isaac Levi — seeks to apply pragmatist thinking in a decision-theoretic perspective. Susan Haack — teaches at the University of Miami, sometimes called the intellectual granddaughter of C.
Peirce, known chiefly for foundherentism. Nicholas Rescher — advocates a methodological pragmatism that sees functional efficacy as evidentiating validity.
Pragmatists in the extended sense [ edit ] Name Lifetime Notes Cornel West — thinker on race, politics, and religion; operates under the sign of "prophetic pragmatism".
Wilfrid Sellars — broad thinker, attacked mainstream variants of foundationalism in the analytic tradition. Frank P. Ramsey — author of the philosophical work Universals.
Karl-Otto Apel — author of "Charles S. Jürgen Habermas — author of "What is Universal Pragmatics? American philosophy Charles Sanders Peirce bibliography Doctrine of internal relations Holistic pragmatism New legal realism Pragmatism as a tradition of communication theory Pragmatic model Realpolitik.
In Zalta, Edward N. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Spring ed. Reprinted often, including Collected Papers v.
The Meaning of Truth. Retrieved March 5, Prometheus Books. Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Internet Archive Eprint. See pp. II, n. Reprited often, including Collected Papers v. XV, n. Peirce wrote: I have always fathered my pragmati ci sm as I have called it since James and Schiller made the word [ pragmatism ] imply "the will to believe," the mutability of truth, the soundness of Zeno's refutation of motion, and pluralism generally , upon Kant, Berkeley, and Leibniz.
After discussing James, Peirce stated Section V, fourth paragraph as the specific occasion of his coinage "pragmaticism", journalist, pragmatist, and literary author Giovanni Papini 's declaration of pragmatism's indefinability see for example "What Is Pragmatism Like", a translation published in October in Popular Science Monthly v.
Peirce in his closing paragraph wrote that "willing not to exert the will willing to believe " should not be confused with "active willing willing to control thought, to doubt, and to weigh reasons ", and discussed his dismay by that which he called the other pragmatists' "angry hatred of strict logic".
He also rejected their nominalist tendencies. But he remained allied with them about the falsity of necessitarianism and about the reality of generals and habits understood in terms of potential concrete effects even if unactualized.
Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. The Vanderbilt library of American philosophy. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Reprinted Collected Peirce v. Google Books Eprint. Peirce Society , v. Arisbe Eprint. Peirce also harshly criticized the Cartesian approach of starting from hyperbolic doubts rather than from the combination of established beliefs and genuine doubts.
Reprinted Collected Papers v. Rosenthal, C. The Self Awakened: Pragmatism Unbound. Harvard University Press. American Sociological Review.
Theory and Society. Online First 2 : — February 15, Democracy and Leadership: On Pragmatism and Virtue. New York: Lexington Books.
New York: Lexington. Dewey on Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Shields relies primarily on Dewey's logic of Inquiry. A pragmatist approach to the problem of knowledge in health psychology Journal of Health Psychology , 14 6 , 1— Public Administration as Pragmatic, Democratic and Objective.
Public Administration Review. Miller's 'Why old Pragmatism needs and upgrade'. Rortyan Pragmatism: 'Where's the beef' for public administration.
Miller on 'Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade. Applied Research Projects. Texas State University Paper Texas State University.
Paper Faculty Publications-Political Science. Shields Volume 4: — Shields and Nandhini Rangarajan A pragmatist approach to the problem of knowledge in health psychology.
Feminist interpretations of John Dewey. Pragmatism and feminism: Reweaving the social fabric. Where are all the pragmatists feminists?
Hypatia, 6, 8— A holistically Deweyan feminism. Metaphilosophy, 32, — Duran, J. The intersection of pragmatism and feminism. Feminism and pragmatism: George Herbert Mead's ethics of care.
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35, — Jane Addams social thought as a model for a pragmatist-feminist communitarianism.
Hypatia, 19, — Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Part II, 16 January , pp.
Reality and the Mind: Epistemology. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Thomas Dewey's new logic: a reply to Russell.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter ed. In Russell, Bertrand ed.
Why I am not a Christian, and other essays on religion and related subjects. New York: Simon and Schuster. Morris Dickstein, Duke University Press, Baldwin, James Mark ed.
Koch ed. Heath , Lexington, MA, Reprinted, pp. Reprinted, Arnold Isenberg ed. James, William , " Pragmatic and Pragmatism ", 1 paragraph, vol.
Baldwin ed. Reprinted, CP 5. Peirce, Collected Papers. Peirce, C. Burks ed. Cited as CP vol. Quine, W. Quine, From a Logical Point of View , Ramsey, F.
Rescher, N. This further reading section may contain inappropriate or excessive suggestions that may not follow Wikipedia's guidelines.
Please ensure that only a reasonable number of balanced , topical , reliable , and notable further reading suggestions are given; removing less relevant or redundant publications with the same point of view where appropriate.
Consider utilising appropriate texts as inline sources or creating a separate bibliography article. December Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Links to related articles. Schools of thought. Mazdakism Mithraism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism. Kyoto School Objectivism Postcritique Russian cosmism more Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response.
Consequentialism Deontology Virtue. Action Event Process. By region Related lists Miscellaneous. Portal Category Book. Activism Argument Argumentum ad populum Attitude change Censorship Charisma Circular reporting Cognitive dissonance Critical thinking Crowd manipulation Cultural dissonance Deprogramming Echo chamber Education religious , values Euphemism Excommunication Fearmongering Historical revisionism Ideological repression Indoctrination Media manipulation Media regulation Mind control Missionaries Moral entrepreneurship Persuasion Polite fiction Political engineering Propaganda Propaganda model Proselytism Psychological manipulation Psychological warfare Religious conversion forced Religious persecution Religious uniformity Revolutions Rhetoric Self-censorship Social change Social control Social engineering Social influence Social progress Suppression of dissent Systemic bias Woozle effect.
Axioms tacit assumptions Conceptual framework Epistemology outline Evidence anecdotal , scientific Explanations Faith fideism Gnosis Intuition Meaning-making Memory Metaknowledge Methodology Observation Observational learning Perception Reasoning fallacious , logic Revelation Testimony Tradition folklore Truth consensus theory , criteria World disclosure.
Nihilism Optimism Pessimism Reclusion Weltschmerz. Philosophical logic. Analytic philosophy. Epistemology Language Mathematics Science.
Aretaic Linguistic. Classical Mathematical Non-classical Philosophical. Analysis paradox of analysis Analytic—synthetic distinction Counterfactual Natural kind Reflective equilibrium Supervenience.
Charlie Broad Norman Malcolm G. Ramsey Ludwig Wittgenstein. Anscombe J. Austin A. Ernest Nagel. Carl Gustav Hempel Hans Reichenbach. Quine John Rawls.
David Chalmers J. Mackie Peter Singer J. James F. Conant Alice Crary Cora Diamond. Category Index.
Philosophy of mind. Philosophy of biology. Griesemer Paul E. Francisco J. Wilson Jonas Salk. Philosophy of mind History of biology.
Philosophy of science. Alchemy Criticism of science Descriptive science Epistemology Faith and rationality Hard and soft science History and philosophy of science History of science History of evolutionary thought Logic Metaphysics Normative science Pseudoscience Relationship between religion and science Rhetoric of science Science studies Sociology of scientific knowledge Sociology of scientific ignorance.
Philosophers of science by era. Plato Aristotle Stoicism Epicureans. Hidden categories: CS1: long volume value Use American English from January All Wikipedia articles written in American English Use mdy dates from January Articles with short description All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February Articles with unsourced statements from March Articles with unsourced statements from June Articles with unsourced statements from July Articles with unsourced statements from September Articles with unsourced statements from January Articles with hCards Wikipedia spam cleanup from December Wikipedia further reading cleanup Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy links Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers.
Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version.
Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote. Part of a series on. Ancient Medieval Modern Contemporary. Philosopher Philomath Wisdom Women in philosophy. Philosophy portal.
William James. The word pragmatic is often contrasted with the word idealistic , which means based on or having high principles or ideals.
Pragmatic , on the other hand, means based on real world conditions or circumstances—considering what can realistically be done as opposed to the best theoretical course of action.
A person who acts pragmatically can be called a pragmatist. The noun form of pragmatic is pragmatism. Pragmatism can mean the practice of being pragmatic , but it can also more specifically refer to the philosophical movement that emphasizes practical consequences in the determination of meaning, truth, or value.
The first records of the word pragmatic come from the s. Idealistic people are sometimes told they need to be more pragmatic.
Typically, this means that they should focus on the realistic options or courses of action the pragmatic ones instead of only trying to achieve the best-case scenario—the one based on their ideals.
Of course, many people navigate life with a balance of pragmatism and idealism: sometimes they compromise , and sometimes they stick to their principles no matter what.
The word is most often applied to people, actions, or plans. What are some other forms related to pragmatic? Pragmatic is commonly used in a positive way to praise choices or actions that are considered practical and reasonable.
I hate Twitter takes. Education and career opportunities of our students are under threat. Governments need to be pragmatic to promote them based on their past performance and waive their tuition fees.
However, it rejected the notion that all meaning comes from signs existing purely in the abstract space of langue. Meanwhile, historical pragmatics has also come into being.
The field did not gain linguists' attention until the s, when two different schools emerged: the Anglo-American pragmatic thought and the European continental pragmatic thought also called the perspective view.
The sentence "You have a green light" is ambiguous. Without knowing the context, the identity of the speaker or the speaker's intent, it is difficult to infer the meaning with certainty.
For example, it could mean:. To understand what the speaker is truly saying, it is a matter of context, which is why it is pragmatically ambiguous as well.
Similarly, the sentence "Sherlock saw the man with binoculars" could mean that Sherlock observed the man by using binoculars, or it could mean that Sherlock observed a man who was holding binoculars syntactic ambiguity.
As defined in linguistics, a sentence is an abstract entity: a string of words divorced from non-linguistic context, as opposed to an utterance , which is a concrete example of a speech act in a specific context.
The more closely conscious subjects stick to common words, idioms, phrasings, and topics, the more easily others can surmise their meaning; the further they stray from common expressions and topics, the wider the variations in interpretations.
That suggests that sentences do not have intrinsic meaning, that there is no meaning associated with a sentence or word, and that either can represent an idea only symbolically.
The cat sat on the mat is a sentence in English. If someone were to say to someone else, "The cat sat on the mat," the act is itself an utterance.
That implies that a sentence, term, expression or word cannot symbolically represent a single true meaning; such meaning is underspecified which cat sat on which mat?
By contrast, the meaning of an utterance can be inferred through knowledge of both its linguistic and non-linguistic contexts which may or may not be sufficient to resolve ambiguity.
In mathematics, with Berry's paradox , there arises a similar systematic ambiguity with the word "definable". The referential uses of language are how signs are used to refer to certain items.
A sign is the link or relationship between a signified and the signifier as defined by de Saussure and Huguenin. The signified is some entity or concept in the world.
The signifier represents the signified. An example would be:. The relationship between the two gives the sign meaning.
The relationship can be explained further by considering what we mean by "meaning. An example would be propositions such as:. In this case, the proposition is describing that Santa Claus eats cookies.
The meaning of the proposition does not rely on whether or not Santa Claus is eating cookies at the time of its utterance. Santa Claus could be eating cookies at any time and the meaning of the proposition would remain the same.
The meaning is simply describing something that is the case in the world. In contrast, the proposition, "Santa Claus is eating a cookie right now," describes events that are happening at the time the proposition is uttered.
If someone were to say that a tiger is a carnivorous animal in one context and a mammal in another, the definition of tiger would still be the same.
The meaning of the sign tiger is describing some animal in the world, which does not change in either circumstance.
Indexical meaning, on the other hand, is dependent on the context of the utterance and has rules of use. By rules of use, it is meant that indexicals can tell you when they are used, but not what they actually mean.
As mentioned, these meanings are brought about through the relationship between the signified and the signifier.
One way to define the relationship is by placing signs in two categories: referential indexical signs, also called "shifters," and pure indexical signs.
Referential indexical signs are signs where the meaning shifts depending on the context hence the nickname "shifters.
The referential aspect of its meaning would be '1st person singular' while the indexical aspect would be the person who is speaking refer above for definitions of semantic-referential and indexical meaning.
Another example would be:. A pure indexical sign does not contribute to the meaning of the propositions at all.
It is an example of a "non-referential use of language. A second way to define the signified and signifier relationship is C. Peirce 's Peircean Trichotomy.
The components of the trichotomy are the following:.